EA Sports’ release of the Oklahoma Sooners’ ratings for College Football 26 has ignited controversy and intense fan reactions. Many fans and analysts were surprised to see the Sooners receive lower-than-expected ratings in key areas such as defense and quarterback performance. This has raised questions about how EA evaluated player potential and team cohesion, especially as Oklahoma transitions into the SEC. Despite boasting a strong recruiting class and promising talent, the team’s overall rating seemed to reflect skepticism about its ability to compete at the highest level right away.
The defensive unit, often criticized in recent seasons, was rated particularly low, reinforcing doubts about the team’s readiness for tougher competition. Meanwhile, standout players like quarterback Jackson Arnold and wide receiver Nic Anderson received decent but not elite marks, sparking debate about whether EA undervalued their breakout potential. Some fans argue the ratings reflect past inconsistencies rather than current talent and future upside.
While the ratings are just virtual assessments, they’ve sparked real-world conversations about expectations for Brent Venables’ squad in 2025. Ultimately, the controversy sheds light on how national perception—and algorithm-driven evaluations—still underestimate a program trying to re-establish itself as a top-tier contender.
Leave a Reply